Urgent surgery compared with fibrinolytic therapy for the treatment of left-sided prosthetic heart valve thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

نویسندگان

  • Ganesan Karthikeyan
  • Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan
  • Jo Joseph
  • Niveditha Devasenapathy
  • Vinay K Bahl
  • Balram Airan
چکیده

AIMS Left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) occurs frequently in developing countries and causes major morbidity and mortality. Fibrinolytic therapy (FT) is most commonly used as treatment, but increases the risk of stroke and bleeding. Urgent surgery may be more efficacious and cause fewer complications. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of urgent surgery and FT for the treatment of left-sided PVT. METHODS AND RESULTS We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for articles which included at least five patients each treated with surgery and FT. The primary outcome was complete restoration of valve function. Other outcomes were in-hospital death, thrombo-embolism (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, or non-CNS systemic embolism), major bleeding, and recurrence of PVT on follow-up. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome and pooled them using a random effects model. We included seven eligible studies with 690 episodes of PVT, 446 treated with surgery, and 244 with FT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of the primary outcome (86.5 vs. 69.7%, OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.94-6.78, P = 0.066, I(2) = 74%) or death (13.5 vs. 9%, OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.63-5.98, P = 0.244, I(2) = 59%) between the two treatments. However, compared with FT, urgent surgery was associated with significant reductions in thrombo-embolism (1.6 vs. 16%, OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.24, P < 0.001, I(2) = 0%), major bleeding (1.4 vs. 5%; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, P = 0.046, I(2) = 0%), and recurrent PVT (7.1 vs. 25.4%; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74, P = 0.013, I(2) = 59%). CONCLUSION Urgent surgery was not superior to FT at restoring valve function, but substantially reduced the occurrence of thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding, and recurrent PVT. In experienced centres, urgent surgery should probably be preferred over FT for treating left-sided PVT, pending the results of randomized controlled trials.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Thrombolytic therapy or surgery for valve prosthesis thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Prosthetic heart valve thrombosis is a life-threatening condition for which treatment has not been evaluated by randomized trials. OBJECTIVES To compare surgery with thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of prosthetic valve thrombosis. METHODS A comprehensive systematic review was carried out by independent researchers using PubMed, Web of Knowledge, HINARI, LILACS and EMBASE, i...

متن کامل

Fibrinolytic treatment for recurrent left sided prosthetic valve thrombosis.

A bout 20–25% of patients develop recurrent thrombosis after successful thrombolysis for a first episode of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT). 2 Whereas fibrinolytic treatment (FT) is an acceptable modality of treatment for a first episode of PVT, there are few data on patients with recurrent PVT. We compared the outcome of FT in patients with recurrent PVT with those treated for a first episode.

متن کامل

Accelerated infusion of streptokinase for the treatment of left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND No large prospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of fibrinolytic therapy for left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis, yet it remains the first line of treatment in developing countries. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a randomized controlled trial comparing an accelerated infusion with the conventional infusion of streptokinase in 120 patients with a first episode of left-s...

متن کامل

Management of prosthetic valve thrombosis

Valvular re-replacement is the traditional therapy for prosthetic valve thrombosis[1–7]. Systemic fibrinolysis, leaving the valve substitute in place, and thrombectomy have been suggested as alternative therapeutic options. In order to weigh the risks against the benefits of surgical versus thrombolytic treatment, we performed a metaanalysis of data from 23 major studies reported since 1980 in ...

متن کامل

Right sided heart evaluation after successful mitral valve replacement.

Introduction: It is well-documented that right-sided heart dysfunction and significant tricuspid valve regurgitation (TVR) have adverse effects on patient outcomes after left-sided heart valve surgery. Therefore, the evaluation of right ventriclular (RV) function and TR severity in patients who had undergone mitral valve replacement (MVR), associated with/without concomitant su...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • European heart journal

دوره 34 21  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013